Herta case shows F1 superlicence system needs review

In the wake of Alpine’s driver drama, Red Bull was willing to release Pierre Gasly from his 2023 contract to join the Enstone team, but only if it could get multiple IndyCar race winner Herta to replace him at AlphaTauri.

But with Herta on just 32 superlicence points out of the 40 needed to be allowed to race in F1, that avenue appears to have closed as the FIA announced it wouldn’t make any exceptions for the American.

That prompted angry comments from Red Bull’s Helmut Marko, who said it was “incomprehensible” that a winner of seven IndyCar races couldn’t get a licence and that it was a missed opportunity to get a talented American driver into F1.

McLaren’s Brown, who fields the Arrow McLaren SP team in IndyCar, has run Andretti Autosport IndyCar racer Herta in a year-old McLaren F1 car but would have been willing to release him to Alpine.

Speaking to select media at Laguna Seca’s IndyCar finale, he said “the whole licensing system needs to be reviewed” as he feels IndyCar is undervalued relative to Formula 2.

Both the IndyCar and F2 champion get the required 40 points for a superlicence, but from second place down IndyCar is valued less than F1’s main feeder series despite its stronger pedigree.

“I get that the rules are what the rules are and that rules shouldn’t be broken, but I question whether just because those are the rules that are in place now that those are the correct rules,” he said.

“Someone of Colton’s caliber, or Pato’s [O’Ward] caliber or half the [IndyCar] field are Formula 1 capable. 

“If someone like Colton who’s won a lot of IndyCar races isn’t eligible for a superlicence then I think we need to review the superlicence system.”

Brown points out that world champions Max Verstappen and Kimi Raikkonen, who entered the sport at a young age and skipped racing at a F2 or equivalent level entirely, wouldn’t have been eligible either had the current system been in place when they entered grand prix racing.

“I don’t think Max Verstappen would have been eligible for a superlicence, I don’t think Kimi Raikkonen would have been eligible for a superlicence,” said Brown.

Archive: How unflappable rookie Raikkonen took F1 by storm

“So, if you go back and look, there are a couple of guys, world champions, who wouldn’t have got their superlicence in today’s…